Sen. John Rockefeller and Sen. Olympia Snowe this week introduced proposed cybersecurity legislation that would create a cabinet-level cybersecurity advisor reporting directly to President Obama — and also create extraordinary powers to enable the federal government to take over leadership in making the Internet safer.
This comes with word expected any day now from Melissa Hathaway, the management consultant tasked by President Obama to conduct a 60-day review of U.S. cybersecurity policy.
Rockefeller-Snowe reflects the wide, bi-partisan consensus that has already gelled in the security community about the need for the federal government, directed by the White House, to step forward.
The proposed legislation echoes the recommendations in this report, delivered last December, to then President-elect Obama by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and reinforced by this report delivered earlier this year to the Senate, from the Dartmouth College-based Institute for Information Infrastructure Protection (I3P).
With cyber threats continuing to rise to unprecedented levels, across the board, endangering consumers, all businesses and our national security, LastWatchdog says, “Let the debate begin, and let’s get moving forward!”
Here are some early reactions to the Rockefeller-Snowe cybersecurity bill from folks paying close attention:
Patricia Titus, CISO at Unisys: “I’m impressed by the section of the bill that calls for National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop cybersecurity metrics and compliance tests. Most of the framework has already been completed by NIST, so this might be viewed as now ‘operationalizing’ the framework. But I’m concerned because it’s taken us more than seven years to refine the existing Federal Information Security Management Act, and this legislation calls for completion in one year, which seems aggressive. This work is critical, and we need to do it right the first time.”
Mandeep Khera, CMO at CENZIC: “We think this type of a bill is long over due. There’s a virtual war being launched against the United States – both in private and public sectors – from other countries and we are not even aware of our weaknesses. Forget about fighting them, we first need to understand these vulnerabilities at the entire infrastructure layer and understand where most of the attacks are coming from. Once we know the weaknesses, we need to put together a plan to enforce compliance for all organizations and provide help where the smaller companies cannot afford to be compliant by offering special tax breaks or other government aid.”
Leslie Harris, President and CEO at Center for Democracy and Technology: “The cybersecurity threat is real. But such a drastic federal intervention in private communications technology and networks could harm both security and privacy.”





Discuss this Article
10 Comments on "Senate bill mandates strong federal role to make Internet safer"
Great to see some progress. Developing the right incentives for a productive public/private partnership is the key to sucess.
Excellent post. It is interesting to see the proposed legislation echoing the recommendations delivered last December by the CSIS Commission on Cybersecurity for the 44th Presidency. I look forward to your future postings on this very important legislation.
Cool post. Good to see that some progress is finally being made on the subject.
Great post. This bill is very important but at the same time we need to keep privacy rights in mind. Public/Private partnership will bring in great ideas while having the backing of the government backing and infrastructure. You are right – “let’s get it moving forward” before it’s too late
The government and the WH, we”ll end up with an Orwellian net. No better to suffer. No problem with NIST writting standards that is part of function, but let us tread carefully before granting such broad power to a cabinet (political)level agency.
Are you folks madd?? You would give the power over the exercise of free speech on the internet to one person or agency? What ever happened to privacy? What about checks and balances in our government? Don’t get rid of your printers and typewriters yet. It may be the ONLY way free speech will survive this power grab.
my job as a computer programmer is a very satisfying job ::